A security firm has accused a computer criminal collective called the Cobalt Group of having perpetrated ATM malware attacks across Europe.
In a report, the Russian security firm Group-IB names Cobalt as the most likely hacking gang behind a series of attacks that compromised ATMs in 14 countries, including the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, and Britain.
Group-IB based the name they have given the hacking gangs off “Cobalt Strike,” a penetration testing tool which helped the attackers leverage banking computers infected by malicious emails to access specialized servers that control ATMs.
From those compromised servers, the Cobalt gang conducted what are known as “touchless jackpotting” attacks. The group essentially commanded the target ATMs to spit out cash, but it did so without physically manipulating the terminals. Everything was done remotely in a logical (i.e. malware), not a physical, attack.
Cobalt knew what it was doing, too. Sometimes, all it took was ten minutes for the threat actor to gain control over a financial organization’s banking network.
Unfortunately, we don’t know a lot about the Cobalt group at this time. According to Reuters, Group-IB thinks the group is connected to another computer criminal group called Buhtrap based upon the two collectives’ use of similar tools and techniques.
Buhtrap stole 1.8 billion rubles ($28 million) from Russian banks from August 2015 to January 2016. It is believed to have done so using fraudulent wire transfers and not logical attacks.
Cobalt’s attacks constitute part of a growing crime wave against financial organizations, a surge which has included the use of malware to infect ATM hard disks and issue fraudulent money transfers via the SWIFT secure messaging provider.
Dmitry Volkov, Head of the Investigation Department and the Bot‑Trek Intelligence service, is concerned about the growing threat malware poses to banks. That’s why he’s urging financial organizations to upgrade their defenses against logical attacks:
“Logical attacks on ATMs are expected to become one of the key threats targeting banks: they enable cybercriminals to commit fraud remotely from anywhere globally and attack the whole ATM network without being ‘on the radar’ of security services. That said, this type of attack does not require development of expensive advanced software – a significant amount of the tools used are widely available on the deep web. Every bank is under threat of logical attacks on ATMs and should be protected accordingly.”
The best way banks can protect themselves against malware attacks is by placing their ATMs inside a building that’s in full-view of a security camera. That won’t deter a determined criminal, but it will certainly raise the stakes for attackers with more to lose.
Banks should also train their employees to be on the lookout for common threats like targeted attacks. It sounds like Cobalt likes to use malicious email attachments exploiting Microsoft Word vulnerabilities to gain a foothold into a target organization’s network.
If employees know how to spot suspicious emails, a group like Cobalt won’t be able to access an organization’s ATM servers. They will therefore need to conduct their attacks locally, which is certainly more risky.
Just as an added layer of defense, banks should also use email filters and deny-lists to reduce the chance that malicious emails will ever reach their employees.
Found this article interesting? Follow Graham Cluley on Twitter to read more of the exclusive content we post.