
Social media fuels conspiracies galore after Donald Trump is shot at a rally, cryptocurrency websites are hijacked after a screw-up at Squarespace, and our guest takes a close look at bottoms on Instagram.
All this and much much more is discussed in the latest edition of the “Smashing Security” podcast by cybersecurity veterans Graham Cluley and Carole Theriault, joined this week by Zoë Rose.
Warning: This podcast may contain nuts, adult themes, and rude language.
Show full transcript ▼
This transcript was generated automatically, probably contains mistakes, and has not been manually verified.
Smashing Security, episode 381, Trump shooting conspiracy, Squarespace account hijack, and the butt stops here with Carole Theriault and Graham Cluley.
Hello, hello, and welcome to Smashing Security episode 381. My name's Graham Cluley.
Now, coming up on today's show, Graham, what do you got?
All this and much more coming up on this episode of Smashing Security.
Absolutely. Everything's going really, really well. There definitely aren't any problems. None at all. No breaches occurring. We can all relax, take it easy.
We've pretty much solved the whole problem. Well, is that true? Because I suppose there have been a few little problems which have occurred if you really want to nitpick.
These days, because last year Squarespace did a deal with Google. Squarepace, Square, I can't even say it, Squarepace.
It was a domain name registrar and domain management service where you could set up your website, buy your domains if you wanted to, and configure how they were going to operate.
And many other things that Google starts, it got a bit bored with it because Google really hasn't got very much patience.
You know, plays with a toy for a while and then goes, oh, need something else now.
Everything from Google Wave and Google Hangouts and Google Buzz and Google Reader, Google Dodgeball. Do you remember that?
That was a social search service that connected users with their friends or friends of friends that are able to answer their questions so that these, you know, they've tried all kinds of things.
But Google Domains, thankfully, didn't just kill it stone dead because obviously there are a lot of people using it.
Instead, Google decided to sell it lock, stock and barrel, everything that was basically Google Domains to Squarespace.
If you had purchased that via Google Domains, if you were administering it via Google Domains, now Squarespace are running it for you instead.
In order to visit a website, you would have to type in an IP address. So it'd be 192.168 blah blah blah blah blah blah.
You know, you'd have to type in a number with dots in it rather than typing in smashingsecurity.com or whatever it is, amazon.com or whatever the website is.
So it's really, really handy, these services. But now Squarespace is in charge of all of those users, of all of those websites. What could possibly go wrong?
I think they would know their game. I would feel okay about that, hearing it peripherally. You know, I'd be, oh, sounds like a good idea.
So as I said, what could possibly go wrong with Squarespace now taking over those 10 million Google purchased domains.
I'm not talking about the kind of websites set up by your Auntie Flo or your Uncle Bob, but ones run by organizations, in particular ones related to cryptocurrency.
So what is happening is these websites have suffered DNS hijacking attacks. That's a Domain Name Service hijacking attack.
So as I said, when you are with a registrar, with a domain registrar and a domain management service managing your domain, you decide what IP address your website is actually at.
So you can point it from the name to the actual server address, which will be that hard-to-remember number.
Maybe it's your cryptocurrency exchange or where you have your cryptocurrency wallet of all your investments, where you store your NFTs or something like that, and you access it the normal way.
You type in its URL, you get the URL correct. You aren't clicking on someone else's link.
You are typing in the URL, you get it absolutely correct, or you use your bookmarks where it really is the URL to that website.
It could be trying to steal your cryptocurrency, could try and grab your NFTs from any connected cryptocurrency wallets which you have.
So actually, it'd be great news if you went to a porn site.
It doesn't mean the website itself has been actually hacked or defaced, but it's more the telephone directory, if you like, has been altered.
And if you went to The Sun on that particular day, the front page story was that Rupert Murdoch had died in his front garden.
He'd tripped over some shrubbery and inhaled some palladium. And people would go there and believe the story to be true, 'cause they were at The Sun.
And you know, there's lots of benefits there for a malicious actor.
And the one thing they had in common is they were originally registered with Google Domains and have now been switched to Squarespace looking after their domain name registration and their records.
So, questions: Have the website owners been careless in their choice of passwords? No, they haven't.
Did they fail to set up proper multifactor authentication when they set up their domains at Google Domains? No, they didn't.
It looks like there's been an almighty screw-up when the domains were passed from Google Domains to Squarespace.
But it appears that there's been a security issue with the account recreation, because obviously they took these accounts which were at Google and they had to recreate the accounts at Squarespace when they transferred the domains.
And what appears to have happened is that Squarespace assumed people logging into their accounts on Squarespace would use the social sign-up options from Google, for instance, or Apple.
You know how you can actually log in with another account to some of these things and log in, which I've always hated.
And it looks like Squarespace— so difficult to say— looks like Squarespace assumed people would use those sort of third-party authentications rather than asking for an email address.
And what was found was that hackers were able to go to the login page having worked out what the likely email address would be of a particular website, enter the email address, and it wouldn't ask for any password authentication.
Because Squarespace—
So it's pretty easy, it appears, for those websites.
Let me remind you, 10 million websites which have been transferred over, and it looks like it's been fairly easy for people to compromise these websites and change their settings, provided they got there before the genuine users to sort of start off the sequence with Squarespace.
So if they went there, which is quite plausible that they would.
They've written a very in-depth piece, which I'll link to in the show notes.
All about how they think this has happened and what steps you should take if your domains are some of those which have been transferred from Google Domains to Squarespace.
In a nutshell, turn on multifactor authentication immediately.
Make sure you don't have any other users associated with your account because potentially they won't have created a Squarespace account yet.
So even if you sort out your account, other members of your team—
But other than that, you might actually want to reconsider where your domain names are actually being managed from because maybe you need a more secure option because it doesn't look like there's any audit trails.
It doesn't look like they were notifying people when changes were being made to their—
So the part that you're talking about, oh, they might want to switch because they're not doing best practice. The reality is they made a mistake.
Yeah, they made an assumption, which we know what that— we know what that stands for. But also, you don't trust them anymore, right?
So an organization that's impacted by that, their customers may not trust them anymore, even though they didn't make any mistake. So it's a multi-layer issue there.
And also, I really like the idea that they just really, really messed up. Like, I was thinking it was going to be something complex, but no.
I think if they were to get into bed with some popular cybersecurity podcasts and sponsor them. In fact, for an increased rate, we could even completely edit out this story.
So it'll be removed from our archive.
If you've heard people in the past complain about, oh, Instagram shows you such inappropriate photos on your feed, and everybody knows that those people complaining, they're seeing those inappropriate photos because those are the photos they look at.
That's how the algorithm works. It wants to encourage you to stay on the platform, and so it suggests photos based on your viewing habits.
I typically look at plants and children's games, and I don't remember what else — cooking. I take a lot of recipes off Instagram. I don't know why, it's very weird.
But children's games, plants, and some other random stuff. Sometimes my child likes to look at fish, and so I've got aquariums on there. That's the type of content.
It's generally quite bland. Oh, and books. I read a lot of books. I'm very nerdy, if you don't know. I read a lot, and so I get a lot of recommendations and book recommendations.
None of that relates to pornography. I'm not a super exciting person, so I don't really look at Instagram for explicit photos. I'm sure people do. All the power to them. I don't.
Although, on, I think it was Sunday, maybe Saturday, I opened Instagram and the first photo that came up was quite explicit.
I'm thinking, was my account compromised? No, what is going on?
And I clicked through the account that showed me this inappropriate photo, and it was clearly a sock account of some sort. It had only two photos. It was explicit.
Well, the main photo was a bottom. A very lovely bottom, I will say, but not really my interest.
And historically, I do get requests — I have a private account, and I do get requests from probably people going to send me malware where they are, you know, follow me or look at this cam or whatever, those kind of requests on Instagram.
Obviously I block them all because again, I'm not interested, but I was thinking, how did this show up in my feed? And so I blocked the account, and then I got another one.
It wasn't bloody. Another one.
But it was another one, and I'm thinking, okay, I have children, and as I said, sometimes my children like to look at fish, and I really don't want them seeing some image of somebody's bottom doing extracurricular activities.
Don't really want them to see that. They're not ready.
You're a mom and you share your Instagram sparingly with your kid and you don't want to have some kind of sexy, sexy hubba hubba something come up, especially when you don't follow that shit.
I even have the safe filters setting, so it blocks anything explicit. Talk about the most boring Instagram you could get. That's what I have.
So I'm thinking, why in the world does this show up? And I was trying to figure it out, and I realized it's ads.
I imagine it's one of those same approaches as usual where you try and get people to add your account and you're pretending to be this sexy lady and they click on your malicious link or download some malicious file, whatever.
I'm assuming it's the same kind of use case, I guess.
I share photos of my children to my specific audience, you know, I'm very careful. Careful, yeah, that's the word.
And it's frustrating because now I've disabled my account because there's no reason for me to be on there anymore, really, because I don't feel comfortable having that there in case if I ever do open it and my children are there, I don't want them to see that.
Because if you want to share photographs and things with your family and friends about your young children, for instance, or things that you're up to, you can't do that anymore, can you?
I imagine you want this end-to-end encrypted or something as well, right?
So, you know, it's almost like I can only get better at this point. I was never comfortable using Meta anyway, because I don't like Facebook.
I don't like Instagram, but I don't know of another alternative. I guess I'm just getting old. I don't know what's hip.
You can email us at , or you can also tweet us @SmashInSecurity, no G, Twitter won't allow us to have a G, and we will pass on your recommendations to Zoe.
Hmm.
president clutched his right ear before dropping quickly to ground. And we all know what I'm talking about.
Within seconds, members of the Secret Service surrounded him, and within a minute, the ex-president got up and pumped his fist towards the crowd as blood ran from his ear to his cheek.
Actually, if I were a Secret Service agent, you know, in that scene right then, and I'm trying to use my life to protect this asset, I'd be pretty annoyed that they pumped the air.
I get they want to tell their fan club, hey, I'm okay. But, you know, I'm a paid worker putting my life on the line.
You know, just could you just, could you just cockroach out of here on the floor like a normal person? Could you stop encouraging them from shooting again?
Loads of papers put on the cover the next day of their, I don't even know if they're newspapers.
And almost immediately after the incident, conspiracy theorists across the political spectrum began to speculate over the attempted assassination, causing this disinformation tsunami, right?
And this is at a time when, you know, there's a highly politicized and divided America. I think I can say that.
And everyone wants to know what happened, who's behind it, and what happens next. So what do you do? You go online.
This is according to Pew Research on this topic.
I'm sure much more is going on, right? They say, they admit to regularly getting their news from the socials. And we're talking here YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, X, and Reddit, right?
So first off, when you heard this news of the attempted assassination, did you have an initial thought on what might have happened?
Did you have a narrative go through your head at all?
And at that point, they didn't say that he'd been shot. They just said rushed off the stage.
So I thought, well, maybe he'd had some sort of medical incident or fainted or something like that.
But I thought I imagine there might be someone out there who doesn't like Donald Trump.
The reason I think I thought that was I'm thinking, this guy is wily, street smart, snubs bureaucratic governance, knows the power of martyrdom and all that.
And I just thought, you know, and remember Bolsonaro, remember? Yeah, in Brazil, right? There was an attempted assassination on him in 2018.
He became the next country's president the year later.
And so I hit news outlets like, you know, like Reuters and AP News, and I also went to PBS, I went to NPR, I went to Fox News, read a bunch of articles from them.
And actually you can just go to our episode show notes actually, because all the sources are there. So I wasn't alone in thinking that this whole thing might be staged, right?
But the staging conspiracy was adopted by people regardless of political leaning. Right, though the message was kind of different. So the whole keyword was staged.
That was the keyword that was on the socials, right? So left-leaning conspiracy theorists seem to point the finger at the Republican Party.
Their supposed evidence was that there was no blood on Trump's face until he raised his hand to his cheek, although apparently this is difficult to confirm based on videos posted online.
Nonetheless, they claim that Trump used a yellow squib to release fake blood.
I think I thought that. I think that was my issue with it, that still was so powerful.
Yeah, they don't yet have a clear motive or reason yet, so at the time of recording they're still looking into that.
There was also theories that the Secret Service allowed Trump to stand and pose as he was escorted off stage, so that was a whole show, that picture being so perfect.
But, so I think, you know, if you're driven—
We have also right-leaning theorists putting the blame at the feet of a number of people like Joe Biden, right? The president, or the U.S.
Department of Justice, or other powerful actors.
But then you've also got powerful influencers, right? Fueling the fire or stirring the pot or however you want to put it. You have political advisors and Democratic donors.
This guy urged supporters in an email late on Saturday to contemplate the, quote, possibility that this shooting was encouraged and maybe even staged so Trump could get photos and benefit from the buzz.
The next day he apologized, so I think he got, yeah, he was told to take that down.
But Elon Musk apparently reposted multiple messages from an alt-right political activist asking how the shooter was able to crawl onto the closest roof to a presidential nominee, suggesting the Secret Service was intentionally remiss.
One of these posts garnered some 91 million views so far.
There have been books and movies and all the rest of it and inquiries. Now, it's like that, but it's with petrol poured on top, isn't it?
Because social media is inflaming these conspiracy theories.
There was one, a bloodied ear becoming, for example, a reaction to hearing a new album by female singer Katy Perry, right? So that was going around, and people are dead.
And we only have a few puzzle pieces, and then we're given a bunch more and we have no idea if they're duds or if they're legit.
And then we make this whole viewpoint up and we share it online.
I think that's really important.
When I used to do— I've never worked in intelligence, but I've worked beside intelligence, with the team, and I always make sure to look at multiple sources and consider somebody else's opinion that I don't agree with because it's really easy to create an echo chamber online.
Trump were fake accounts.
And PeakMetrics, a firm that tracks online trends, said the conspiracy theories made up 12% of all social media traffic referenced the shooting at some point on Sunday.
And if you screw up, most importantly, own it and apologize, remove the statement and move on. Don't leave it there to fester with no comment.
Because, you know, especially in the States, free speech includes the right to spout snake oil and horse poop and all the other synonyms you guys can come up with. Quackery.
Vanta automates compliance for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and more, saving you time and money while helping you build customer trust.
Plus, you can streamline security reviews by automating questionnaires and demonstrating your security posture with a customer-facing trust center. All powered by Vanta AI.
Over 7,000 global companies like Atlassian, Flow Health, and Quora use Vanta to manage risk and improve security in real time.
Get $1,000 off Vanta when you go to vanta.com/smashing. That's vanta.com/smashing for $1,000 off.
Built by practitioners for practitioners, M-WISE is a unique intimate community where expert knowledge is shared in a non-competitive, non-commercial spirit, brought to you by Mandiant, now part of Google Cloud.
It's a place where real talk and serious knowledge are shared generously, and where the focus is on the practical tactical solutions that make sense right now.
M-WISE is vendor-neutral and not sales-focused. Even better, you'll get ample opportunity to connect one-to-one, not only with your peers, but with the experts.
And this year, they're taking it up a notch in Denver. So get ready for microbrews, killer views, and serious cyber. Join M-WISE from September 18th-19th in Denver.
Get details at smashingsecurity.com/mwise. That's M-W-I-S-E. And thanks to M-WISE for sponsoring the show.
But every day, employees use personal devices and unapproved apps that aren't protected by MDM, IAM, or any other security tool.
There's a giant gap between the security tools we have and the way we actually work.
1Password calls it the access trust gap, and they've also created the first-ever solution to fill it.
1Password Extended Access Management secures every sign-in for every app on every device.
It includes the password manager that you know and love, and the device trust solution you've probably heard of on this podcast, back when it was called Collide.
1Password Extended Access Management cares about user experience and privacy, which means it can go places other tools can't, like personal and contractor devices.
It ensures that every device is known and healthy, and every login is protected.
So stop trying to ban BYOD or shadow IT and start protecting them with 1Password Extended Access Management. Check it out at 1password.com/smashingsecurity.
And thanks to 1Password for supporting the show. And welcome back. And you join us at our favorite part of the show, the part of the show that we like to call Pick of the Week.
It could be a funny story, a book that they've read, a TV show, a movie, a record, a podcast, a website, or an app, whatever they wish.
It doesn't have to be security-related necessarily.
My pick of the week is a TV program which I watched, and I have to tell you, I had a rather interesting experience while watching it. I watched a show on ITV.
First of all, that's a bit of a novelty, watching something on ITV, which is the independent channel here in the UK. It's called Douglas Is Cancelled.
Have either of you seen this show?
It's the story about a middle-aged white TV news presenter played by Hugh Bonneville, who you may remember from Downton Abbey.
And he's got a younger, attractive female sidekick played by Karen Gillan, who was in Guardians of the Galaxy and Doctor Who and things like that.
And this TV presenter, Douglas, he is accused on Twitter of making an ill-advised sexist joke at a wedding. And social media begins to turn against him.
It's in 4 parts, this show. So it's a bit of a mystery hanging in the air. And it's— that's not really the main reason to watch, though. And I'd read some good things about this.
And so I said to my wife, I said, let's watch this on the telly. Okay, let's give it a try.
Because it is one of the most uncomfortable, tense, and disturbing things I've ever seen on television.
She actually told me at one point, you know, turn the sound off and you can watch the subtitles, because she didn't want to hear what was happening.
But it was also superb.
So, my pick of the week, I'd really recommend it, is Douglas Is Cancelled. And I'd love to discuss it with people who've actually seen the programme.
I don't want to give anything away to people who have yet to experience it. So that is Douglas Is Cancelled, my pick of the week.
When I get really anxious about movies, or, well, more accurate, books, I read the end. And then I go back and read the rest.
So every time I try and think of something, I'm can't be technology, can't be technology. So mine is child-related. I have two children now. Which is—
But the biggest problem I have is I have two children, and yes, I have two hands, but I also need to do other things. And they're young enough that they both want to be carried.
And buggies or prams, or what are they called otherwise? Strollers. Yes, strollers are not the most useful things.
Like, if you've got a single stroller or buggy or pram, then you have another child you're carrying.
If you've got a double, you run into it's really long and awkward, or it's really wide and awkward. And so, hello again, Instagram.
Now it's Instagram moms recommended, because in North America you see a lot of Instagram moms with wagons. They're like wagons for children, so they've got like seats.
So that's what inspired me to buy my pick of the week, which is literally a wagon. But it's a wagon that you push like a buggy.
It's the greatest thing in the entire world, and I absolutely adore... What's its brand? Pinolino.
Even today, I went, dropped the kids at crèche and then went to the shop and bought some food, and I filled it with food. So it was amazing. I love it. Greatest thing ever.
So not technical, although I do call it my Cyber Wagon.
Carole, what's your pick of the week?
And we're kind of midway through this process and it's been hard weeks.
I know I'm bitching to a person who has a parent of two human children, but Kate, last week she got out and she came back in heat.
And then we had this tomcat stalking us outside for three days, meowing for her. And she's sitting there flirting at the window like a pervert.
And he's all like, "Ugh." It was disgusting. Anyway, so I needed a distraction. Distraction, right? I needed a distraction. So I bought some toys and stuff. Seems to...
she prefers our sofa to any scratching post, but whatever. What do I do? What do I do? What do I do to keep her entertained? The answer came to me.
Someone must have invented cat TV, right? If you can imagine it, must exist. Rule 34. So people have put hours upon hours of TV featuring birds, and rodents and whatnot.
And my little Wilmington Wilma loves it. She watched for an hour last night while we had dinner.
And then these birds come and chipmunks and all kinds of shit. And she tries to...
it's all great except when she gets excited and jumps on the desk, hits the keyboard and kills the video.
And then she mews and like little servants, we come along and give her her fix. Anyway, so my pick of the week, Cat TV.
If you have a bored, irritated, annoyed cat because they really wanna be outside and they can't be yet, maybe this is for you. So links in the show notes of my preferred.
Listeners, try it on your kid, let us know, because I bet they will love—
What's the best way for folks to do?
Follow Smashing Security in your favorite podcast app, such as Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Pocket Casts.
It's thanks to them all that this show is free.
For episode show notes, sponsorship info, guest list, and the entire back catalog, more than 380 episodes, check out smashingsecurity.com.
Hosts:
Graham Cluley:
Carole Theriault:
Guest:
Zoë Rose – @RoseSecOps
Episode links:
- Killed by Google.
- Squarespace Enters Definitive Agreement to Acquire Google Domains Assets – Squarespace.
- A Squarespace Retrospective, or How to Coordinate an Industry-Wide Incident Response – Security Alliance.
- Trump shooting: all seven conspiracy theories examined – The Telegraph.
- Fact-checking the wild conspiracy theories related to the attempted Trump assassination – PBS News.
- We fact-checked some of the rumors spreading online about the Trump assassination attempt – Reuters.
- Minutes after Trump shooting, misinformation started flying. Here are the facts – AP News.
- Joy Reid suggests Trump couldn’t ‘avoid the consequences’ of his own rhetoric after assassination attempt – Fox News.
- The Gunshots Rang Out. Then the Conspiracy Theories Erupted Online – New York Times.
- Trump assassination attempt – News, Research and Analysis – The Conversation.
- Douglas is Cancelled – ITV.
- Douglas Is Cancelled review – you might hate this show for daring to exist – The Guardian.
- Klappbollerwagen ‘Cruiser’ – PinoLino.
- Videos for Cats to Watch – YouTube.
- Cat TV for Cats to Watch – YouTube.
- Entertainment for Cats – YouTube.
- Smashing Security merchandise (t-shirts, mugs, stickers and stuff)
Sponsored by:
- 1Password Extended Access Management – Secure every sign-in for every app on every device.
- mWISE – Don’t miss the cybersecurity conference built by practitioners, for practitioners. mWISE runs September 18 – 19 2024 in Denver.
- Vanta – Expand the scope of your security program with market-leading compliance automation… while saving time and money. Smashing Security listeners get $1000 off!
Support the show:
You can help the podcast by telling your friends and colleagues about “Smashing Security”, and leaving us a review on Apple Podcasts or Podchaser.
Become a supporter via Patreon or Apple Podcasts for ad-free episodes and our early-release feed!
Follow us:
Follow the show on Bluesky at @smashingsecurity.com, or on Mastodon, on the Smashing Security subreddit, or visit our website for more episodes.
Thanks:
Theme tune: “Vinyl Memories” by Mikael Manvelyan.
Assorted sound effects: AudioBlocks.
