According to media reports, British Home Secretary Priti Patel is backing a new ad campaign that will accuse Facebook of “blindfolding” police investigations into child sex abuse.
What has Facebook done to warrant the attention? It has introduced the option for Facebook Messenger calls and video chats to be end-to-end encrypted – just like Facebook Messenger text chats have been since 2016…
…and just like the chats you have on Signal, Wire, and FaceTime are too.
Priti Patel is just the latest in a long line of British politicians to rail against encrypted messaging, arguing that it makes it harder for the police and intelligence agencies to catch paedophiles, drug barons, and terrorists.
Patel’s predecessors have even tried to argue that “real people” don’t want secure communications.
But if you weaken end-to-end encrypted messaging by creating backdoors for intelligence agencies or police to monitor communications, you don’t make life less safe for the criminals. You make it less safe for everyone.
Indeed, all a criminal would do is use another service that does provide end-to-end encryption, or create their own service beyond the reach of the authorities and impervious to any ad campaign backed by Priti Patel.
Encryption isn’t a bad thing, it’s a good thing. Encryption protects our privacy from hackers and organised criminals. It defends our bank accounts, our shopping, our identities. It saves the lives of human rights activists working against oppressive regimes.
Journalist James Ball summed up in a tweet the idiocy of being anti-encryption:
The real-world analogy to the Home Office attitude to encryption is as if the police campaigned to ban door locks because they made it harder for police to get into criminals' homes.
— James Ball (@jamesrbuk) September 6, 2021
We shouldn’t be looking for ways to weaken or outlaw encrypted communications. If anything, we should be encouraging their wider use.
I’m no fan of Facebook. I think it is, in many ways, ghastly. But I welcome anything they do to harden the security and privacy of their users.
Found this article interesting? Follow Graham Cluley on Twitter or Mastodon to read more of the exclusive content we post.
One comment on “Priti Patel backs ad campaign that criticises Facebook’s stance on end-to-end encryption”
Whether there's encryption there or not, police have a notoriously poor track record of convicting anyone for kiddy porn, especially if they are in the higher circles of public office.